Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Girish Ramakrishnan
12e073e8cf use node: prefix for requires
mostly because code is being autogenerated by all the AI stuff using
this prefix. it's also used in the stack trace.
2025-08-14 12:55:35 +05:30
Girish Ramakrishnan
3904f50c1b locks: make full backup use a prefix 2025-07-25 14:46:55 +02:00
Girish Ramakrishnan
7e0803c4b4 clean up task locks 2025-07-18 18:12:07 +02:00
Girish Ramakrishnan
0fa281083e apps: backup is not a state anymore
this is launched as a separate task
2025-07-18 14:14:54 +02:00
Girish Ramakrishnan
0aca6c2588 locks: rename lock types to make it clearer 2025-07-18 13:40:15 +02:00
Girish Ramakrishnan
69d5283caf mail: use a lock to protect container recreation
needs a lock because the cert code also restart mail server from tasks
2024-12-16 22:34:52 +01:00
Girish Ramakrishnan
bb392207ea remove global lock
Currently, the update/apptask/fullbackup/platformstart take a
global lock and cannot run in parallel. This causes situations
where when a user tries to trigger an apptask, it says "waiting for
backup to finish..." etc

The solution is to let them run in parallel. We need a lock at the
app level as app operations running in parallel would be bad (tm).
In addition, the update task needs a lock just for the update part.
We also need multi-process locks. Running tasks as processes is core
to our "kill" strategy.

Various inter process locks were explored:

* node's IPC mechanism with process.send(). But this only works for direct node.js
children. taskworker is run via sudo and the IPC does not work.

* File lock using O_EXCL. Basic ideas to create lock files. While file creation
can be done atomically, it becomes complicated to clean up lock files when
the tasks crash. We need a way to know what locks were held by the crashing task.
flock and friends are not built-into node.js

* sqlite/redis were options but introduce additional deps

* Settled on MySQL based locking. Initial plan was to have row locks
or table locks. Each row is a kind of lock. While implementing, it was found that
we need many types of locks (and not just update lock and app locks). For example,
we need locks for each task type, so that only one task type is active at a time.

* Instead of rows, we can just lock table and have a json blob in it. This hit a road
block that LOCK TABLE is per session and our db layer cannot handle this easily! i.e
when issing two db.query() it might use two different connections from the pool. We have to
expose the connection, release connection etc.

* Next idea was atomic blob update of the blob checking if old blob was same. This approach,
was finally refined into a version field.

Phew!
2024-12-07 20:41:22 +01:00