just move bind mounts. the initial idea was to use docker volume backends
but we have no plans for this. in addition, usage of volumes means that
files get copied from the image and into volume on first run which is
not desired. people are putting /app/data stuff into images which ideally
should break.
Unlike IPv4, IPv6 requires a link-local address on every network interface on which the IPv6 protocol is enabled, even when routable addresses are also assigned
Docker's initial IPv6 support is based on allocating public IPv6 to containers.
This approach has many issues:
* The server may not get a block of IPv6 assigned to it
* It's complicated to allocate a block of IPv6 to cloudron server on home setups
* It's unclear how dynamic IPv6 is. If it's dynamic, then should containers be recreated?
* DNS setup is complicated
* Not a issue for Cloudron itself, but with -P, it just exposed the full container into the world
Given these issues, IPv6 NAT is being considered. Even though NAT is not a security mechanism as such,
it does offer benefits that we care about:
* We can allocate some private IPv6 to containers
* Have docker NAT66 the exposed ports
* Works similar to IPv4
Currently, the IPv6 ports are always mapped and exposed. The "Enable IPv6" config option is only whether
to automate AAAA records or not. This way, user can enable it and 'sync' dns and we don't need to
re-create containers etc. There is no inherent benefit is not exposing IPv6 at all everywhere unless we find
it unstable.
Fixes#264
We removed httpPort with the assumption that docker allocated IPs
and kept them as long as the container is around. This turned out
to be not true because the IP changes on even container restart.
So we now allocate IPs statically. The iprange makes sure we don't
overlap with addons and other CI app or JupyterHub apps.
https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/6743https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/19001
we can just use container IP instead of all this httpPort exporting magic.
this is also required for exposing httpPaths feature (we have to otherwise
have multiple httpPorts).
It's all very complicated.
Approach 1: Simple move unbound to not listen on 0.0.0.0 and only the internal
ones. However, docker has no way to bind only to the "public" interface.
Approach 2: Move the internal unbound to some other port. This required a PR
for haraka - https://github.com/haraka/Haraka/pull/2863 . This works and we use
systemd-resolved by default. However, it turns out systemd-resolved with hog the
lo and thus docker cannot bind again to port 53.
Approach 3: Get rid of systemd-resolved and try to put the dns server list in
/etc/resolv.conf. This is surprisingly hard because the DNS listing can come from
DHCP or netplan or wherever. We can hardcode some public DNS servers but this seems
not a good idea for privacy.
Approach 4: So maybe we don't move the unbound away to different port after all.
However, all the work for approach 2 is done and it's quite nice that the default
resolver is used with the default dns server of the network (probably a caching
server + also maybe has some home network firewalled dns).
So, the final solution is to bind to the make docker bind to the IP explicity.
It's unclear what will happen if the IP changes, maybe it needs a restart.
